Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Katzman, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 10, No. 2, 235-255 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/009539977801000205

Cui Bono?

Measuring Income-Redistribution Effects of Capital Projects

John D. Montgomery

Harvard University

Martin T. Katzman

University of Texas at Dallas

Evaluation of the income-redistributing performance of a capital project m the Third World produced evidence on four counts that the system was in fact operating to benefit rural and urban poor: (1) The management had attempted to reduce "hidden costs" otherwise borne by the poor by subsidizing the extension of services to outlying areas and by providing low-interest credit for household connections. (2) The poor were using the services as fully as well-to-do households were, the actual consumption being related significantly to family size and not income (3) The progressive rate struc ture used in the project bore more heavily on the rich than on the poor in general, though this "transfer effect" would have been greater if rates had combined a flat fee with a small surcharge based on the appraised value of the property. (4) A "critical incident" study of experience among users showed that all groups, regardless of ethnic origin, socioeconomic status, or location, perceived the project to be beneficial to the entire society, and especially to the rural poor. Information about these effects can be used by policymakers in international agencies for devising appropriate loan terms for utility-type projects It can also guide project managers in the design of rate structures, the setting of user charges, and the assignment of priorities for the future expansion of services.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?