This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, C. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Judicial Decisions and Organizational Change

A Theory

Texas A&M University

This theoretical note presents a theory explaining the reactions of organizations to court orders that require the organizations to change some policy, program, or pro cedure. The theory is based on theories of "rational choice" and conceives of the change process in terms of four stages: (1) interpretation of the court decision, (2) evaluation of the decision, (3) searches for information and alternatives to the court decision, and (4) selection of one or more alternatives. A review of relevant judicial impact literature produces support for specific hypothesis derived from the theory. Finally, suggestions for further empirical research and theoretical developments are advanced.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. W. Crowley Selection Tests and Equal Opportunity: The Court and the EEOC Administration Society, November 1, 1985; 17(3): 361 - 384. [Abstract]