This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goodsell, C. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Double-Dip-Some Afterthoughts

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

The double-dip hypothesis of Lee Sigelman is highly provocative. Nonetheless, ambivalent perceptions of bureaucracy are otherwise explainable. More important, Sigelman's bureaucratization scale is not a time scale, meaning that dysfunctionalities may be encountered at slow rates and thus minimized or countered. As a result, the "dips" may be quite shallow or scarcely existent. Complications with the model also arise from definition of the variables used and the possible affects of other variables.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Hartwig The Paradox of Male Volent/Benevolent Bureaucracy Administration Society, August 1, 1990; 22(2): 206 - 227. [Abstract]