Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Administration & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Couto, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

TVA's Old and New Grass Roots

A Reexamination of Cooptation

Richard A. Couto

Vanderbilt University

Philip Selznick's examination of cooptation reinterpreted the idealized reputation of TVA's grassroots administration as the ordinary pursuit of organizational needs. This article examines cooptation in TVA since Selznick's study including a new round of cooptation related to reforms beginning in 1977. This later look at cooptation shows it to be a changing balance of coopted groups, an agency's leadership, and an agency's political environment. This dynamic concept emphasizes cooptation as a changing process of participation and representation rather than a stable, enduring outcome of bureaucratic process. This is consistent with Selznick's conclusion, although the history of coopted groups makes clearer that the principal function of cooptation, for the agency and the coopted groups, is to legitimate an agency's leadership. In addition, this history suggests two important caveats to Selznick's findings. First, coopted groups, under certain conditions, may acquire real power over an agency; second, cooptation may be a satisfactory and effective form of participation at times for some relatively powerless groups.

Administration & Society, Vol. 19, No. 4, 453-478 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/009539978801900405
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Administration & SocietyHome page
R. A. Couto
Heroic Bureaucracies
Administration Society, May 1, 1991; 23(1): 123 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]