Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Werlin, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, 46-70 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/009539978802000103

The Theory of Political Elasticity

Clarifying Concepts in Micro/Macro Administration

Herbert H. Werlin

Independent Consultant

Political systems are most effective when authority is widely dispersed without diminishing the ultimate responsibility of top leadership for results. Administrative effectiveness depends upon the capacity and willingness of leaders to delegate operational responsibility to subordinates without reducing supervisory prerogatives and correctional potential. Insofar as leaders must rely upon nonpersuasive forms of power (e.g., coercion, corruption, or intimidation), their capacity to delegate responsibility is limited. The more elastic the organization or political system, the softer are the more normal manifestations of power, allowing and encouraging delegation of responsibility, decentralization, widespread participation, deregulation, communication from below, and constructive criticism. At the same time, supervision remains effective, facilitating the introduction of more intrusive forms of power (coercion, discipline, and punishment) as needed. Political elasticity theory is here used to overcome such persistent dichotomies in administrative literature as: leadership followership; conflict/harmony; centralization/decentralization; regulation/deregulation; private sector/public sector control; and elitism/pluralism. It is also used to revaluate development administration literature.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Asian and African StudiesHome page
H. H. Werlin
Ghana and South Korea: Explaining Development Disparities An Essay in Honor of Carl Rosberg
Journal of Asian and African Studies, January 1, 1994; 29(3-4): 205 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]