|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Administration & Society, Vol. 21, No. 4,
395-412 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/009539979002100401
© 1990 SAGE Publications
Leadership in the Administrative State
The Concept of Administrative Conservatorship
Larry D. Terry
Radford University
This essay provides an alternative framework for interpreting the leadership role of public administrators in governance. It is argued, contrary to the views held by a large band of public administration theorists, that leadership in the administrative state need not and should not be governed solely by the entrepreneurial leadership model. In fact, excessive entrepreneurship is seen as a threat to public institutions. An argument is presented that public administrators are engaged in a special kind of leadership called Administrative Conservatorship. Public administrators are depicted as guardians of public institutions and, in turn, regime values.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. N. Kalu
Entrepreneurs or Conservators?: Contractarian Principles of Bureaucratic Performance
Administration Society,
November 1, 2003;
35(5):
539 - 563.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Zajac and J. G. Bruhn
The Moral Context of Participation in Planned Organizational Change and Learning
Administration Society,
January 1, 1999;
30(6):
706 - 733.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. U. Haque and M. W. Spicer
Reason, Discretion and Tradition: A Reflection on the Burkean Worldview and Its Implications for Public Administration
Administration Society,
March 1, 1997;
29(1):
78 - 96.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Vinzant and L. Crothers
Street-Level Leadership: Rethinking the Role of Public Servants in Contemporary Governance
The American Review of Public Administration,
December 1, 1996;
26(4):
457 - 476.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. D. Terry
Cooperative Extension's Urban Expansion: The Default of Leadership or a Responsiveness to Changing Times?
Administration Society,
May 1, 1995;
27(1):
54 - 81.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Vinzant and T. H. Roback
Dilemmas of Legitimacy: The Supreme Court, Patronage, and the Public Interest
Administration Society,
February 1, 1994;
25(4):
443 - 466.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Shareef
Subsystem Congruence: A Strategic Change Model for Public Organizations
Administration Society,
February 1, 1994;
25(4):
489 - 517.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Cook
The Representative Function of Bureaucracy: Public Administration in Constitutive Perspective
Administration Society,
February 1, 1992;
23(4):
403 - 429.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. D. Terry
The Public Administrator Ashero: All that Glitters is not Gold: Rejoinder to Christopher Bellavita
Administration Society,
August 1, 1991;
23(2):
186 - 193.
|
 |
|
|