This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Spicer, M. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A Contractarian approach to Public Administration

Cleveland State University

This article seeks to apply a contractarian approach to the design of public administrative structures and processes. It speculates as to what kind of public administration could have emerged hypothetically from unanimous agreement between rational individuals in a constitutional setting. The contractarian approach suggest the desirability of a system of public administration which provides administrators with significant discretion in following the directives of political leaders while at the same time constraining the use of that discretion for private purposes. Normative implications for various schools of public administration theory are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Vogelsang-Coombs Mayoral Leadership and Facilitative Governance The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2007; 37(2): 198 - 225. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Vinzant and L. Crothers Street-Level Leadership: Rethinking the Role of Public Servants in Contemporary Governance The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 1996; 26(4): 457 - 476. [Abstract]

				M. W. Spicer On Friedrich Hayek and Public Administration: An Argument for Discretion within Rules Administration Society, May 1, 1993; 25(1): 46 - 59. [Abstract]

				R. C. Box The Administrator as Trustee of the Public Interest: Normative Ideals and Daily Practice Administration Society, November 1, 1992; 24(3): 323 - 345. [Abstract]