Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bozeman, B.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 24, No. 3, 290-322 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/009539979202400302
© 1992 SAGE Publications

Red Tape and Task Delays in Public and Private Organizations

Barry Bozeman

Syracuse University

Pamela N. Reed

Arizona State University

Patrick Scott

Syracuse University

Using a measure of red tape based on the amount of time required for the performance of core organizational tasks, hypotheses are tested as to why some organizations have more red tape than others. Among the explanations considered are organizational size, sector, "publicness" defined in terms of governmental interaction and influence independent of sector, and external constraint defined in terms of interorganizational agreements and percentage of time devoted to external activities. The data for the study come from a national study of more than 900 research-intensive organizations. The focus on these organizations assures that the core tasks performed are similar to one another and reduces the likelihood that findings are simply a function of differences in organizational mission. Results indicate that it is useful to think of red tape in terms of diverse dimensions related to key organizational tasks. Both sector and publicness are positively associated with measures of red tape, with publicness providing a somewhat more robust explanation along some dimensions of red tape. Contrary to previous studies, organizational size seems to have little bearing on differences in red tape.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
D. H. Coursey and S. K. Pandey
Content Domain, Measurement, and Validity of the Red Tape Concept: A Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis
The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 2007; 37(3): 342 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
R. M. R Turaga and B. Bozeman
Red Tape and Public Managers' Decision Making
The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2005; 35(4): 363 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
P. G. Scott and S. K. Pandey
Red Tape and Public Service Motivation: Findings from a National Survey of Managers in State Health and Human Services Agencies
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2005; 25(2): 155 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
B. Rocheleau and L. Wu
Public Versus Private Information Systems: Do they Differ in Important Ways? A Review and Empirical Test
The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2002; 32(4): 379 - 397.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
P. G. Scott and S. Falcone
Comparing Public and Private Organizations: An Exploratory Analysis of Three Frameworks
The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 1998; 28(2): 126 - 145.
[Abstract]