Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schulman, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 25, No. 3, 353-372 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/009539979302500305

The Negotiated Order of Organizational Reliability

Paul R. Schulman

Mills College

A critical problem facing modern organizations in a variety of settings is the erosion of slack. Given narrowing performance margins allowed many organizations, managers are tempted to "lock in" organizational performance through elaborated rules and procedures, formal authority assignments, and clearly differentiated job responsibilities. A case study of one organization seeking very high reliability in its performance—a nuclear power plant—is offered to demonstrate a contrary point of view. Reliability, it is argued, can best be achieved not through attempts at organizational invariance but through the management of fluctuations in important organizational relationships and practices. This strategy enhances reliability while preserving the protective functions of organizational slack.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
D. Levinthal and C. Rerup
Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning
Organization Science, July 1, 2006; 17(4): 502 - 513.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
L. Metcalfe
European Policy Management: Future Challenges and the Role of the Commission
Public Policy and Administration, July 1, 2004; 19(3): 77 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
K. E. Weick
That's Moving Theories that Matter
Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 1999; 8(2): 134 - 142.
[PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
C. Perin
Organizations as Contexts: Implications for Safety Science and Practice
Organization Environment, June 1, 1995; 9(2): 152 - 174.
[Abstract]