This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by White, O. E Articles by Wolf, J. E Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Deming's Total Quality Management Movement and the Baskin Robbins Problem

Part 1: Is it Time to Go Back to Vanilla?

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

James E Wolf

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

The movement toward adopting Total Quality Management (TQM) as a working organizational philosophy has reached a critical point. Experience with the implementation of TQM has yielded mixed results. Probably the main reason that the TQM innovation has not been more consistently successful is that, in many cases, it has been misunderstood and implemented more in name only than in a manner true to its principles. Taking the W E. Deming version of TQM as an exemplar, the paradigmatic essence of TQM is described, explained, illustrated, and contrasted with the traditional and dominant rational model of management. Then the issues that distinctively confront the implementation of TQM in the public sector are reviewed. The authors conclude that TQM holds great positive potential for adapting government administration to the requirements of what appears will be a fundamentally different and more demanding future. This is Part I of a two-part article.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. F. White and J. F. Wolf Deming's Total Quality Management Movement and the Baskin Robbins Problem: Part 2: Is this Ice Cream American? Administration Society, November 1, 1995; 27(3): 307 - 321. [Abstract]