Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forrester, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 28, No. 4, 466-488 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/009539979702800403
© 1997 SAGE Publications

Budgetary Reform Through Organizational Learning

Toward an Organizational Theory of Budgeting

John P. Forrester

Guy B. Adams

University of Missouri-Columbia

The legacy of budgetary reform has been dismal. Promising options, rooted in economic values, seem to fall short when confronted with political realities. Nevertheless, the search continues. The authors argue that successful budgetary reform requires attention to the organizational context, in particular human behavioral dynamics. The objectives and execution of budgetary reform must "match" the dynamic objectives and needs of the organization. Moreover, the authors argue that successful implementation requires planned organizational change, in which issues of behavioral change and organizational culture are addressed, as the reform is planned and implemented. They suggust that an organizational theory of budgeting offers not only a better explanation for the failures of budgetary reform but also some potential avenues for greater success in such reforms.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
H. Lu and R. L. Facer II
Budget Change in Georgia Counties: Examining Patterns and Practices
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2004; 34(1): 67 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]