Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svara, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 30, No. 6, 676-705 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00953999922019049

Complementarity of Politics and Administration as a Legitimate Alternative to the Dichotomy Model

James H. Svara

North Carolina State University

Although the politics-administration dichotomy model has frequently been presented as historically important but conceptually and empirically faulty, the criticisms have missed two fundamental points. First, it is not—as commonly presumed—the founding theory of public administration in the United States but rather a poorly grounded characterization of the early literature that took hold in the late 1950s. The term dichotomy was rarely used before that time and never used by the "founders" of the field who were supposed to have invented the model. Second, there is an alternative model of complementarity that has been present in the literature from Wilson onward. It stresses interdependency, reciprocal influence, and extensive interaction between elected officials and administrators along with recognition of the need for distinct roles and political supremacy. The politics-administration complementarity model—elaborated here with references to the "old" public administration literature prior to 1960—offers a strong foundation on which we can build.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
J. K. Taylor
Transgender Identities and Public Policy in the United States: The Relevance for Public Administration
Administration Society, November 1, 2007; 39(7): 833 - 856.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
M. R. Rutgers
Splitting the Universe: On the Relevance of Dichotomies for the Study of Public Administration
Administration Society, March 1, 2001; 33(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
C. M. Wheeland
City Management in the 1990s: Responsibilities, Roles, and Practices
Administration Society, July 1, 2000; 32(3): 255 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
D. W. Haines
Minimalism in Governance: Workers' Compensation in a Southern State
Administration Society, November 1, 1999; 31(5): 616 - 638.
[Abstract] [PDF]