Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by O’Toole, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 31, No. 6, 667-686 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00953990022019281

Structures for Policy Implementation

An Analysis of National Legislation, 1965-1966 and 1993-1994

Thad E. Hall

University of Georgia

Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr.

University of Georgia

Public administration has long considered the administrative agency as the core institution shaping action. But specialists in policy implementation, in particular, have suggested that networks spanning multiple organizations may be important phenomena. National legislation from two Congresses is analyzed to determine the kinds of structures explicitly stipulated or encouraged for new or amended programs. The most important questions have to do with the extent to which single-agency or networked (multiactor) structures are used and the relative degree to which intergovernmental versus intragovernmental programs are prominent. The evidence shows that the great majority of legislation requires multiactor structures spanning governments, sectors, and/or agencies; intergovernmental programs are especially prominent; and the multiactor character of the structures has remained relatively constant. These findings carry implications for the study and practice of public administration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
K. J. Meier and L. J. O'Toole JR.
Managerial Networking: Issues of Measurement and Research Design
Administration Society, November 1, 2005; 37(5): 523 - 541.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
T. E. Hall and L. J. O'Toole Jr.
Shaping Formal Networks through the Regulatory Process
Administration Society, May 1, 2004; 36(2): 186 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
R. F. Durant, Y.-P. Chun, B. Kim, and S. Lee
Toward a New Governance Paradigm for Environmental and Natural Resources Management in the 21st Century?
Administration Society, January 1, 2004; 35(6): 643 - 682.
[Abstract] [PDF]