Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kouzmin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Korac-Kakabadse, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, 29-69 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00953990022019344

Mapping Institutional Impacts of Lean Communication in Lean Agencies

Information Technology Illiteracy and Leadership Failure

Alexander Kouzmin

University of Western Sydney-Nepean

Nada Korac-Kakabadse

Cranfield School of Management

Information technology’s (IT) influence on formative contexts and on requisite leadership roles is conceptualized both as an enabling force for organizational networking and a reducing force for diversity in leadership functions and cultural contexts. The contemporary "New Age" leadership literature calls for personal and ideological leadership unencumbered by issues of cultural context, communicative complexities and the need for more comprehensive and sophisticated global social analysis. At the same time, this literature punctuates a noticeable indifference to the issue of strategic IT literacy on behalf of agency elites. A preoccupation with "lean and mean", unbridled managerial prerogatives, competitive rhetoric overstressing means at the expense of legitimate ends, business process re-engineering, downsizing, and IT-mediated globalization can be construed as an abject failure of agency elites to understand and protect distinctive competencies in governance and in organized action. Administrative theory urgently requires a renewed understanding of vulnerability and resilience in agency behavior and the need for renewed institutional and IT-literate leadership.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
K. N. Kalu
Bridging the Divide: An Integrated Model of National Security Education for a New Era of International Governance
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2008; 38(1): 80 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
J. H. Lim and S.-Y. Tang
Urban E-Government Initiatives and Environmental Decision Performance in Korea
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 109 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]