This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McEldowney, R. Articles by Murray, W. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Not Just for Bureaucrats Anymore

Bureaucrat Bashing, Overhead Democracy, and Managed Care

Auburn University

William L. Murray

Virginia Tech

Managed care is increasingly subject to political micromanagement and to attacks in the press. Managed care is undergoing the kind of bureaucrat bashing familiar to government employees, because managed care plans are being asked to perform the same type of allocation of social resources (in this case, access to health care) typically conducted by government employees. In so doing, managed care has run afoul of two deeply ingrained American traditions: bureaucrat bashing and overhead democracy. This article uses a case study of managed care bashing to argue that private interests who perform a role in allocating social resources will be subject to the same type of criticism government employees face in allocating social resources (bureaucrat bashing), as well as political leaders’ impulses toward control (overhead democracy). The ombudsman model of governing managed care is advanced as an alternative to managed care bashing and overhead democracy.

Administration & Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, 93-110 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00953990022019362


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?