This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by la Porte, T. M. Articles by de Jong, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web

Empirical Findings and Theoretical Speculations

George Mason University

Chris C. Demchak

University of Arizona

Martin de Jong

University of Technology

The foundations for governance in an information age are developing through the World Wide Web as it becomes the principal electronic public gateway into government organizations. Governmental openness is now important to a variety of strategies for governmental reform. The Web (a) makes government more efficient; (b) facilitates the functioning of new network-like arrangements between public organizations, the private sector, and citizens; and (c) empowers citizens to play a stronger role in interacting with government. We describe the concept of organizational openness and summarize a methodology to measure it on a worldwide basis. Data from 1997 through 2000 are presented, showing rapid diffusion of the Web and variation in levels of openness, even across countries with similar levels of economic and political development. Bureaucracies adopt Web technologies as a function not of traditional diffusion processes, but of emergent institutional isomorphism. Short-term prospects for responsive government improve, but so do unrealistic expectations affecting government legitimacy.

Administration & Society, Vol. 34, No. 4, 411-446 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0095399702034004004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Lim and S.-Y. Tang Urban E-Government Initiatives and Environmental Decision Performance in Korea J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 109 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Rodriguez Bolivar, C. Caba Perez, and A. M. Lopez Hernandez E-Government and Public Financial Reporting: The Case of Spanish Regional Governments The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2007; 37(2): 142 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Rubaii-Barrett and L. R. Wise From Want Ads to Web Sites: What Diversity Messages Are State Governments Projecting? Review of Public Personnel Administration, March 1, 2007; 27(1): 21 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. A. Brewer, B. J. Neubauer, and K. Geiselhart Designing and Implementing E-Government Systems: Critical Implications for Public Administration and Democracy Administration Society, September 1, 2006; 38(4): 472 - 499. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. W. Stanley and C. Weare The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation: Evidence From an Agency Online Discussion Forum Administration Society, November 1, 2004; 36(5): 503 - 527. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Yang Neoinstitutionalism and E-Government: Beyond Jane Fountain Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2003; 21(4): 432 - 442. [Abstract] [PDF]