This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hansen, K. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Discourse Heresies

Utilizing the Empirical Referents to Evaluate Military Base Transitions

University of Arkansas

Scholars of public administration theory have been debating the merits of democratic administration and nascent forms of discourse for quite some time. Rather than coming to some synthesis, the discussion seems to be diverging into two competing factions, one that advocates egalitarian discussion for its own sake and the other that seeks to use discourse as a means to question the old view of "bureaucracy" and replace it with a consensus that leads to substantive results. This study provides a statistical analysis of discursive behavior in local military base redevelopment efforts, an example of interlocal cooperation, in support of the notion that discourse can facilitate tangible policy outcomes. Rather than attempting to subvert the synergistic spirit of discourse with "rationality," this analysis simultaneously illustrates both the benefits and limitations of measurement.

Key Words: empirical referents • military bases • development • administration theory

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?