Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McSwite, O. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 36, No. 4, 406-426 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0095399704266744

Creating Reality Through Administrative Practice

A Psychoanalytic Reading of Camilla Stivers’ Bureau Men, Settlement Women

O. C. McSwite

Virginia Tech University and George Washington University

Camilla Stivers’book, Bureau Men, Settlement Women, is being misread as a feminist political tract and overlooked as the resource that it is for the field of public administration. A review of the current literature of feminism reveals that Stivers’work, a historical study of the New York Bureau of Municipal Research, cannot be described by any version of feminist theory. Rather, her central concern is how the male-dominated Bureau movement pushed the field away from the model of the city as "home"—which developed in the women’s reform movement—and toward the idea of the city as "business." A Lacanian psychoanalytic reading reveals a critical implication of her research: The women’s movement carried the potential to bring a balance to public agency discourse, one adequate for the new realities that the social problems of the day required. The administration as business model denies the achievement of this balance.

Key Words: public administration history • women • Lacan • social constructionism • poststructuralism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
D. Burnier
Erased History: Frances Perkins and the Emergence of Care-Centered Public Administration
Administration Society, July 1, 2008; 40(4): 403 - 422.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
T. J. Catlaw
Authority, Representation, and the Contradictions of Posttraditional Governing
The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 2006; 36(3): 261 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
C. Stivers
A Place Like Home: Care and Action in Public Administration
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2005; 35(1): 26 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]