This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shields, P. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Classical Pragmatism Does Not Need an Upgrade

Lessons for Public Administration

Texas State University

In 2003, Administration& Society published Patricia Shields's "The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration." Shortly thereafter, Hugh Miller responded with "Old Pragmatism Needs and Upgrade" in the Disputatio Sine Fine section of Administration& Society. He argued that scholars like Shields, Evans, and Snider should incorporate the ideas of Richard Rorty into their scholarship. Miller's article was followed by a series of 9 essays debating the merits of Dewey and Rorty for public administration. This article summarizes the debate and argues that Classical Pragmatism does not need an upgrade.

Administration & Society, Vol. 37, No. 4, 504-518 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0095399705278351


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. Pesch The Publicness of Public Administration Administration Society, April 1, 2008; 40(2): 170 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Dick Action research literature 2004-2006: Themes and trends Action Research, December 1, 2006; 4(4): 439 - 458. [Abstract] [PDF]