This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wise, C. R. Articles by Christensen, R. K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Full and Fair Capacity

Federal Courts Managing State Programs

Robert K. Christensen

Indiana University

Federal courts play a significant role in the management and execution of public programs. Judicial intervention is evident in examples ranging from prisons to mental hospitals to schools. To clarify the appropriateness of federal judicial intervention, the authors construct a so-called full and fair judicial and administrative capacity standard. Where state judicial and administrative capacities are evident, federal courts do well to refrain from exercising jurisdiction. The analysis of the authors also reflects consideration of the capacity of the federal judiciary to manage a state administrative scheme.

Key Words: courts • judicial capacity • management • administrative capacity • abstention

Administration & Society, Vol. 37, No. 5, 576-610 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0095399705278591


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Bumgarner and C. B. Newswander The Irony of NPM: The Inevitable Extension of the Role of the American State The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2009; 39(2): 189 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]