This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Howe, L. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Enchantment, Weak Ontologies, and Administrative Ethics

University of West Georgia

The article contributes to an enlivening of ethical discourse by employing the notion of weak ontology. Weak ontologies insist that fundamental sources of inspiration, or "ontostories, " are indispensable to a vital ethics, even as it admits that every onto-story is contestable. The article considers powerful perspectives that militate against implementing weak ontology: liberalism's conception of the neutral framework and Max Weber's characterization of the modern world as disenchanted. The article argues that these two perspectives contribute to a nay-saying ethic and a negative form of governance because the disenchanted world they describe is too hard to love. The article ends with an examination of an ethical perspective that seeks to overturn the disenchantment story by cultivating a nontheistic experience of enchantment.

Key Words: weak ontology • administrative ethics • disenchantment • enchantment

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?