Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aldrich, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 7, No. 4, 419-454 (1976)
DOI: 10.1177/009539977600700402

Resource Dependence and in Terorganiza Tional Relations

Local Employment Service Offices and Social Services Sector Organizations

Howard Aldrich

Department of Organizationl Behavior New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations Cornell University

A resource dependence model is proposed as a conceptual scheme to account for organizational behavior observed under conditions where interorganizational relations are a critical environmental contingency. The model is used to explain the pattern of transactions between 19 local Employment Service offices and 249 social service organizations in New York State. Four aspects of interorganization transaction are taken as problematic: intensity, reciprocity, standardization of interaction, and the degree of perceived cooperation in the relationship. The results support the important role assigned to the manipulation of authority by the resource dependence perspective, and the findings document the minimal role played by domain consensus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
C. Rodriguez, A. Langley, F. Beland, and J.-L. Denis
Governance, Power, and Mandated Collaboration in an Interorganizational Network
Administration Society, April 1, 2007; 39(2): 150 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
M. Kessler
Interorganizational Environments, Attitudes, and the Policy Outputs of Public Agencies: A Comparative Case Study of Legal Services Agencies
Administration Society, May 1, 1987; 19(1): 48 - 73.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
M. Burns and A. Mauet
Administrative Freedom for Interorganizational Action: A Life-Cycle Interpretation
Administration Society, November 1, 1984; 16(3): 289 - 305.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
M. Burns
Domain Consensus in Alabama Health Systems Agencies: An Empirical Assessment
Administration Society, November 1, 1982; 14(3): 319 - 342.
[Abstract]