Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Administration & Society
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooney, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Fields, Organizations, and Agency

Toward a Multilevel Theory of Institutionalization in Action

Kate Cooney

Boston University, Massachusetts

Melding key concepts from structuration theory with the organizational field framework, this article builds on current work establishing a micro foundation for neoinstitutional organizations theory. First, the author presents a synthesized theoretic approach to explore the institutionalization process. Then, applying the framework to data from a case study of a welfare-to-work program, the article examines the institutionalization process from the standpoint of one group of organizational actors (social service workers). The analysis shows that institutionalization can be a highly contentious process enacted by knowledgeable actors who engage, reject, and at times transform the value-laden structures in which they are working.

Key Words: organizational fields • structuration theory • agency

References

  • Barley, S.R., & Tolbert, P.S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution . Organization, 18(1), 93-118 .
  • Barman, E. (2002). Asserting difference: Strategic response of nonprofit organizations to competition . Social Forces, 80(4), 1191-1222 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Burawoy, M., Burton, A., Ferguson, A.A., Fox, K.J., Gamson, J., Gartrell, N., et al. (1991). Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press .
  • Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Daugherty, R.H., & Barber, G.M. (2001). Self sufficiency, ecology of work, and welfare reform . Social Service Review, 75(4), 662-675 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • DiMaggio, P.J. (1982). Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth century Boston . Media, Culture and Society, 4(1), 303-322 .
  • DiMaggio, P.J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger .
  • DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields . American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening . Organizational Studies, 26(3), 385-414 .[CrossRef]
  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-160). New York: Macmillan .
  • Fligstein, N. (1985). Spread of multidivisional form among large firms 1919-1979 . American Sociological Review, 50(3), 377-391 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
  • Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields . Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105-125 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Gibson, C.M. (1997). Facing off on social policy: Can the right and left find middle ground? Social Service Review, 71(2), 171-199 .[Web of Science]
  • Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. New York: Basic Books .
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge , UK: Polity.
  • Hasenfeld, Y. (2000). Organizational forms as moral practices: The case of welfare departments . Social Service Review, 74(3), 329-351 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Jepperson, R.L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143-163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
  • Katz, J. (1988). A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytic field work. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 127-148). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland . (Original work published 1983)
  • Katz, M.B. (1989). The underserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York: Pantheon .
  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage .
  • Livesay, J. (1985). Normative grounding and praxis: Habermas, Giddens, and a contradiction within critical theory . Sociological Theory, 3(2), 66-76 .[CrossRef]
  • Martin, J.L. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1-49 .[CrossRef]
  • Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony . American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363 .[CrossRef]
  • Mouzelis, N. (1991). Back to sociological theory: The construction of social orders. London: Macmillan .
  • O'Connor, A. (2001). Poverty knowledge: Social science, social policy, and the poor in twentieth-century U.S. history Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
  • Oliver, C. (1988). The collective strategy framework: An application to competing predictions of isomorphism . Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 543-561 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes . Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations . Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Padgett, D.K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Sandfort, J. (2003). Exploring the structuration of technology within human service organizations . Administration & Society, 34, 605-631 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Scott, D.W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Scott, D.W., & Meyer, J.W. (1994). The rise of training programs in firms and agencies: An institutional perspective. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism (pp. 228-254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Sewell, W.H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation . American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29 .[CrossRef]
  • Sillince, J.A., Harindranath, G., & Harvey, C.E. (2001). Getting acceptance that radically new working practices are required: Institutionalization of arguments about change within a healthcare organization . Human Relations, 54(11), 1421-1454 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Weaver, D. (2000). Organizational technology as institutionalized ideology: Case management practices in welfare-to-work programs . Administration in Social Work, 24(1), 1-19 .
  • Weick, K.E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Boston: Blackwell .
  • White, H. (1992). Identity and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
  • Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
  • Zucker, L.G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence . American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726-743 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Zucker, L.G. (1983). Organizations as institutions. Research in Sociology of Organizations, 2, 1-47 .
  • Zucker, L.G. (1988). Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organization: Culture and environment (pp. 23-49). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger .

Administration & Society, Vol. 39, No. 6, 687-718 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0095399707304116


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooney, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?