This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eikenberry, A. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Philanthropy, Voluntary Association, and Governance Beyond the State

Giving Circles and Challenges for Democracy

Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, aeik{at}vt.edu

There has been little discussion about the democratic impacts of new roles and expectations put on private philanthropy and voluntarism in an era of governance beyond the state. This article explores tensions philanthropic voluntary associations face in balancing their internal democratic effects of enhancing civic education and participation of members on the one hand with meeting needs and solving problems in the community on the other. This is brought into focus through an analysis of giving circles, groups that entail individuals pooling resources and then deciding together how and where to give these away. Giving circles highlight the trade-off between the grassroots independence and noncoercive collaborative action that enables voluntary associations to contribute to democratic governance and the ability for these institutions to adequately and comprehensively address community problems; a trade-off that becomes important if one is concerned with serving the public good in an era of government cutbacks and privatization.

Key Words: voluntary associations • giving circles • philanthropy • democracy

References

• AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy. (2005). Giving USA charts. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://www.aafrc.org/
• Agger, B. (2002). Postponing the postmodern: Sociological practices, selves, and theories. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
• Almond, G.A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
• Baccaro, L. (2006). Civil society meets the state: Towards associational democracy . Socio-Economic Review, 4, 185-208 .
• Bachrach, P., & Botwinick, A. (1992). Power and empowerment: A radical theory of participatory democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press .
• Bang, H.P., & Sorensen, E. (1999). The everyday maker: A new challenge to democratic governance . Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21, 325-341 .
• Barber, B.R. (1998). A place for us: How to make society civil and democracy strong. New York: Hill and Wang .
• Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S.M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper & Row .
• Bennett, L. (1998, December). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics . PS Online, 741-761 .
• Boris, E., & Steuerle, E. (1999, October 1). What charities cannot do . The Christian Science Monitor, 11 .
• Borkman, T.J. (1999). Understanding self help/mutual aid: Experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
• Clary, B. (2002, October). Study circles, deliberative discourse and civic education: "Learning to bowl together ." Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration, Los Angeles.
• Cohen, J., & Rogers, J. (1995). Associations and democracy. London: Verso .
• Curti, M. (1973). Philanthropy . In P.P. Wiener (Ed.), Dictionary of the history of ideas : Studies of selected pivotal ideas (Vol. III, pp. 496-493 ). New York: Scribner .
• Diaz, W. (2002). For whom and for what? The contributions of the nonprofit sector. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 517-536). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
• Eikenberry, A.M. (2005). Fundraising or promoting philanthropy? A qualitative study of the Massachusetts Catalogue for Philanthropy . International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 10, 137-149 .[CrossRef]
• Eikenberry, A.M. (2006). Giving circles: Growing grassroots philanthropy . Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 517-532 .[CrossRef]
• Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown .
• Evans, S.M., & Boyte, H.C. (1986). Free spaces: The sources of democratic change in America. New York: Harper & Row .
• Ex-presidents launch private aid effort. (2005, January 4). Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/03/tsunami.presidents
• Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage .
• Fung, A. (2003). Survey article: Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences . Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 338-367 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
• Fung, A., & Wright, E.O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance . Politics & Society, 29, 5-41 .[Free Full Text]
• Gingold, D. (2000, July). New frontiers in philanthropy. Retrieved September 10, 2001, from http://www.timeinc.net/fortune/sections/
• Glassman, R.M. (1989). Democracy and equality: Theories and programs for the modern world. New York: Praeger .
• Gundelach, P., & Torpe, L. (1996, March-April). Voluntary associations: New types of involvement and democracy . Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Oslo, Norway. Retrieved from http://www.aub.aau.dk/phd/department02/text/1996/35031996_2.pdf
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
• Haque, M.S. (2000). Threats to public workplace democracy . Peace Review, 12, 237-241 .[CrossRef]
• Held, D. (1996). Models of democracy. Stanford , CA: Stanford University Press .
• Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy: New forms of economic and social governance. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press .
• Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy (pp. 13-35). New York: Oxford University Press .
• Kemmis, D. (1990). Community and the politics of place. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press .
• Kettl, D. (1988). Government by proxy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press .
• Korelitz, J.H. (2002, August). Second helpings. Real Simple, 85-90.
• Lemann, N. (1996, April). Kicking in groups . The Atlantic Monthly, 277, 22-26 .
• Lubove, R. (1965). The professional altruist: The emergence of social work as a career 1880-1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
• Lynch, J.B. (2003, August/September). Generosity grows with women's fund giving circles . Today's Omaha Woman, 7, 16-17 , 24 .
• McCully, G. (2000, March/April). Is this a paradigm shift ? Foundation News & Commentary, 20-22 .
• McDuff, N. (2005). Societal changes and the rise of the episodic volunteer. In J. L. Brudney (Ed.), ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series 1, No. 2 (pp. 49-62). Indianapolis, IN: Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action .
• Milward, H.B. (1994). Implications of contracting out: New roles for the hollow state. In P. W. Ingraham, B. S. Romzek, & Associates (Eds.), New paradigms for government: Issues for the changing public service (pp. 41-62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
• Milward, H.B., & Provan, K. (2000). Governing the hollow state . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-379 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Milward, H.B., Provan, K., & Else, B. (1993). What does the hollow state look like? In B. Bozeman (Ed.), Public management theory: The state of the art (pp. 309-323). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
• Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy . American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 575-586 .[Abstract]
• Nickel, P.M., & Eikenberry, A.M. (2006). The discourse of marketized philanthropy: A critique of consumption, profit, and celebrity as the basis for benevolence. Unpublished manuscript.
• Ostrander, S.A., & Schervish, P.G. (1990). Giving and getting: Philanthropy as a social relation. In J. Van Til (Ed.), Critical issues in American philanthropy: Strengthening theory and practice (pp. 67-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
• Peters, B.G. (1994). Managing the hollow state . International Journal of Public Administration, 17, 739-756 .[CrossRef]
• Pierre, J. (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press .
• Pratt, J. (1997). Bowling together: Fund raising practices and civic engagement. In D. F. Burlingame (Ed.), Critical issues in fund raising (pp. 247-255). New York: John Wiley .
• Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster .
• Rhodes, R.A.W. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain . Political Quarterly, 65, 138-151 .[CrossRef][ISI]
• Salamon, L.M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: The theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state . Journal of Voluntary Action & Research, 16, 29-49 .
• Salamon, L.M. (1992). Social services. In C. T. Clotfelter (Ed.), Who benefits from the nonprofit sector? (pp. 134-173). Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
• Salamon, L.M. (1995). Partners in public service. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press .
• Scheer, T.J. (2002). The "praxis" side of the equation: Club women and American public administration . Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24, 519-536 .
• Schudson, M. (1996). What if civic life didn't die ? The American Prospect, 25, 17-20 .
• Selinsky, D. (2001, November 30). The power of giving . The News & Observer. Retrieved August 17, 2003, from http://www.givingnetwork.org/circ_top_01_11_30.html
• Skocpol, T. (1996). Unravelling from above . The American Prospect, 25, 20-25 .
• Skocpol, T. (2002). The United States: From membership to advocacy. In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 103-136). Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press .
• Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press .
• Sorensen, E. (2002). Democratic theory and network governance . Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24, 693-720 .
• Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy . Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27, 197-237 .
• Staeheli, L.A. (1997). Citizenship and the search for community. In L. A. Staeheli, J. E. Kodras, & C. Flint (Eds.), State devolution in America: Implications for a diverse society (pp. 60-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
• Stivers, C. (1990). The public agency as polis: Active citizenship in the administrative state . Administration & Society, 22, 86-105 .[Abstract]
• Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the Progressive era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas .
• Szasz, A. (1992). Progress through mischief: The social movement alternative to secondary associations . Politics & Society, 20, 521-528 .[Free Full Text]
• Tocqueville, A. d. (2000). Democracy in America. New York: Bantam Books . (Original work published 1835)
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
• Warren, M.E. (2001). Democracy and association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
• Wolch, J.R. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center .
• Wolpert, J. (1993). Decentralization and equity in public and nonprofit sectors . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22, 281-296 .[Abstract]
• Wuthnow, R. (1994). Sharing the journey: Support groups and America's new quest for community. New York: Free Press .
• Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections: Joining together in America's fragmented communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eikenberry, A. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?