|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Administration & Society, Vol. 39, No. 8,
931-958 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0095399707309355
© 2008 SAGE Publications
Management Theory and Occam's RazorHow Public Organizations Buffer the Environment
Kenneth J. Meier
Texas A&M University, College Station Cardiff University, Wales, UK
Laurence J. O'Toole, Jr
The University of Georgia, Athens
Because organizations are open systems, environmental forces can both benefit the organization and cause it harm. The empirical theory of O'Toole and Meier suggests buffering is related to organizational performance in nonlinear ways by interacting with environmental forces, managerial networking, and organizational structures. This article examines the organization's history to generate an estimate of environmental buffering and then incorporates this measure to study buffering in a more contemporary data set. The authors find buffering is related to a variety of performance indicators and has an especially strong influence on performance in regard to a more disadvantaged clientele. The article then assesses the functional form of the buffering relationship and the potential interaction with other variables. Although the logic of Occam's razor implies that the simple linear relationship best fits the data, significant research needs to be done on other measures of buffering and other data sets before definitive conclusions can be drawn.
Key Words: organizational buffering • management • organizational performance • networks • education
References
- Burtless, G. (1996). Does money matter? Washington, DC: Brookings.
- Ehrenberg, R.G., Chaykowski, R.P., & Ehrenberg, R.A. (1988). Are school superintendents rewarded for performance? In D. H. Monk (Ed.), Micro-level school finance: Issues and implications for policy (pp. 337-364). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
- Fennell, M.L., & Alexander, J.A. (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments. Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 456-476.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Fernandez, S. (2005). Developing and testing an integrative framework of public sector leadership: Evidence from the public education arena. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 197-217.[Abstract]
- Goerdel, H.T. (2006). Taking initiative: Proactive management in networks and program performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 351-367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gonzalez Juenke, E. (2005). Management tenure and network time: How experience affects bureaucratic dynamics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 113-131.[Abstract]
- Hanushek, E. (1996). School resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? (pp. 43-73). Washington, DC: Brookings.
- Hedges, L.V., & Greenwald, R. (1996). Have times changed? The relation between school resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (Ed.), Does money matter? (pp. 74-92). Washington, DC: Brookings.
- Hicklin, A.K. (2004). Network stability: Opportunity or obstacle? Public Organization Review, 4,121-133.[CrossRef]
- Hill, G. (2005). The effects of managerial succession on organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 585-598.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (Eds.). (1998). The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings.
- Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Lynn, L.E., Jr. (1987). Managing public policy. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Lynn, M.L. (2005). Organizational buffering: Managing boundaries and cores. Organization Studies, 26(1), 37-61.[Abstract]
- Meier, K.J., & O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (2001). Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 271-295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Meier, K.J., & O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (2002). Public management and organizational performance: The impact of managerial quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(3), 629-643.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Meier, K.J., & O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (2003). Public management and educational performance: The impact of managerial networking. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 675-685.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Meier, K.J., & O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (2004). Conceptual issues in modeling and measuring management and its impacts on performance. In P. Ingraham and L. E. Lynn Jr. (Eds.), The art of governance: analyzing management and administration. (pp. 195-223) Washington: Georgetown University Press.
- Meier, K.J., O'Toole, L. J., Jr., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2007). Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 357-377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.[CrossRef]
- Miner, A.S., Amburgey, T.L., & Stearns, T.M. (1990). Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 689-713.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Moore, M.H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- O'Toole, L.J., Jr., & Meier, K.J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: The implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(4), 505-526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- O'Toole, L.J., Jr., & Meier, K.J. (2003a). Bureaucracy and uncertainty. In B. C. Burden (Ed.), Uncertainty in American politics (pp. 98-117). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- O'Toole, L.J., Jr., & Meier, K.J. (2003b). Plus ça Change: Public management, personnel stability, and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 43-64.[CrossRef][ISI]
- O'Toole, L.J., Jr., & Meier, K.J. (2004). Desperately seeking Selznick: Cooptation and the dark side of public management in networks. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 681-693.[CrossRef][ISI]
- O'Toole, L.J., Jr., Meier, K.J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2005 ). Managing upward, downward, and outward: Networks, hierarchical relationships and performance. Public Management Review, 7(1), 45-68.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Pitts, D.W. (2005). Diversity, representation, and performance: Evidence about race and ethnicity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 615-631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Powell, W.W., & DiMaggio, P.J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Rainey, H.G. (2003). Understanding and managing public organizations (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Smith, K.B. (2003). The ideology of education: The commonwealth, the market and America's schools. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
- Sorenson, O. (2003). Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration. Management Science, 49(4), 446-463.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Wenglinsky, H. (1997). How educational expenditures improve student performance and how they don't. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
