This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF]) All Versions of this Article: 0095399707312828v1 40/2/170    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Pesch, U. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Publicness of Public Administration

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: udo.pesch{at}ivm.vu.nl.

	Abstract

Public administration theory has always struggled to find a clear-cut understanding of the publicness of public administration. There are at least five different approaches to distinguish public from private organizations. A closer examination shows that these five approaches are based on two conceptual versions of the publicness of public administration. The first conceptual version derives its understanding of publicness from "public goods," whereas the second conceptual version involves the publicness of the "public interest." These two versions are derived from two contravening ontological descriptions of publicness that have been developed in modern political theory. Both of these ontological descriptions have to be acknowledged as constitutive for understanding the publicness of public administration: Public administration can be seen as the empirical manifestation of the confrontation of these two meanings, which implies that "public administration" is constituted by an inconsistent conceptual framework.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?