Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0095399707313700v1
40/3/271    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on February 21, 2008, doi:10.1177/0095399707313700

Administration & Society 2008;40:271.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008
 © 2008 SAGE Publications

Article

The Development of Public Institutions: Reconsidering the Role of Leadership

Arjen Boin1* and Tom Christensen2

1 Louisiana State University
2 University of Oslo

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: BOIN{at}FSW.leidenuniv.nl.


  Abstract
Some public organizations take on the qualities and characteristics of an institution. They become vessels for societal ambition, combining reliable performance with high levels of legitimacy. The functioning and effects of these highly institutionalized organizations are well researched. How these public institutions come about remains somewhat of a mystery, however. Empirical accounts of public institutions consistently identify leadership as a crucial explanatory variable. Conventional wisdom in the field of public administration research, on the other hand, suggests it is impossible for leaders to single-handedly create an organization that effectively serves multiple, complex, and mutually exclusive goals in a volatile environment that is characterized by impatient politicians, scrutinizing media, critical citizens, and scarce resources. This article revisits the relation between leadership and the institutionalization of public organizations. Building on theoretical work and case studies of public institutions, it formulates an analytical framework for studying the role of leadership in institutionalization processes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?