Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rainey, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 15, No. 2, 207-242 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/009539978301500203
© 1983 SAGE Publications

Public Agencies and Private Firms

Incentive Structures, Goals, and Individual Roles

Hal G. Rainey

Florida State University

There is an increasing interest in applying organization theory to public organizations as such, and a need for clarifying the distinction between public and private organizations. This quantitative case study compares questionnaire responses by middle managers in nonprofit public agencies and private profit-making corporations, to test hypotheses concerning differences in incentive structures, organizational goal clarity, and individual role characteristics. The public managers perceive a weaker relationship between performance and extrinsic rewards (weaker "expectancies'") and regard formal personnel procedures (e.g., civil service systems) as constraints on the administration of such rewards. They show higher scores on formalization scales, and are lower on certain dimensions of work satisfaction. There are no differences on scales of organizational goal clarity, role conflict, role ambiguity, and motivational variables.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
D. H. Coursey and S. K. Pandey
Public Service Motivation Measurement: Testing an Abridged Version of Perry's Proposed Scale
Administration Society, September 1, 2007; 39(5): 547 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
D. H. Coursey and S. K. Pandey
Content Domain, Measurement, and Validity of the Red Tape Concept: A Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis
The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 2007; 37(3): 342 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
Y. Wang and Z. Xiang
Toward a Theoretical Framework of Collaborative Destination Marketing
Journal of Travel Research, August 1, 2007; 46(1): 75 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
K. Jung, M. Jae Moon, and Sung Deuk Hahm
Do Age, Gender, and Sector Affect Job Satisfaction? Results From the Korean Labor and Income Panel Data
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2007; 27(2): 125 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
S. K. Pandey and E. W. Welch
Beyond Stereotypes: A Multistage Model of Managerial Perceptions of Red Tape
Administration Society, November 1, 2005; 37(5): 542 - 575.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
P. G. Scott and S. K. Pandey
Red Tape and Public Service Motivation: Findings from a National Survey of Managers in State Health and Human Services Agencies
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2005; 25(2): 155 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
S. A. Frank and G. B. Lewis
Government Employees: Working Hard or Hardly Working?
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2004; 34(1): 36 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
B. E. Wright and B. S. Davis
Job Satisfaction In The Public Sector: The Role of the Work Environment
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 2003; 33(1): 70 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
B. Rocheleau and L. Wu
Public Versus Private Information Systems: Do they Differ in Important Ways? A Review and Empirical Test
The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2002; 32(4): 379 - 397.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
R. Hooijberg and J. Choi
The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Leadership Effectiveness Models: An Examination of Leadership in a Private and a Public Sector Organization
Administration Society, September 1, 2001; 33(4): 403 - 431.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
E. Berman, J. West, and A. Cava
Ethics Management in Municipal Governments and Large Firms: Exploring Similarities and Differences
Administration Society, August 1, 1994; 26(2): 185 - 203.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
B. Bozeman, P. N. Reed, and P. Scott
Red Tape and Task Delays in Public and Private Organizations
Administration Society, November 1, 1992; 24(3): 290 - 322.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
L. D. Terry
Leadership in the Administrative State: The Concept of Administrative Conservatorship
Administration Society, February 1, 1990; 21(4): 395 - 412.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
S. A. Waddock
Understanding Social Partnerships: An Evolutionary Model of Partnership Organizations
Administration Society, May 1, 1989; 21(1): 78 - 100.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
M. A. Emmert and M. M. Crow
Public, Private and Hybrid Organizations: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Publicness
Administration Society, August 1, 1988; 20(2): 216 - 244.
[Abstract]