Administration & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Administration & Society, Vol. 16, No. 2, 195-214 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/009539978401600203
© 1984 SAGE Publications

Bureaucracy as Externalized Self-System

A View from the Psychological Interior

Michael A. Diamond

University of Missouri at Columbia

In this article the author uses Harry Stack Sullivan's theory of social psychiatry and various psychoanalytic applications of organizational theory to suggest to what extent bureaucratized human relations and formal organizational stuctures are products of the psyche and thereby perpetuated by people. A central theme is that bureaucracy enhances the structural manifestation of embedded defensive operations of the person. Asserting the dominance of security needs as motivating forces over other human needs, Sullivan's psychiatry uncovers a serious paradox for students of organizational behavior and development interested in directing the course of bureaucratic reform and organizational change. This article directs future empirical research on the topic of interpersonal and organizational resistance to change and psychological reliance on bureaucratic styles of management.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
S. Kumar, S. Kant, and T. L. Amburgey
Public Agencies and Collaborative Management Approaches: Examining Resistance Among Administrative Professionals
Administration Society, September 1, 2007; 39(5): 569 - 610.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
M. A. DIAMOND and G. B. ADAMS
The Psychodynamics of Ethical behavior in Organizations
American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 1999; 43(2): 245 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
M. A. Diamond
Administrative Assault: A Contemporary Psychoanalytic View of Violence and Aggression in the Workplace
The American Review of Public Administration, September 1, 1997; 27(3): 228 - 247.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
H. F. Stein
Death Imagery and the Experience of Organizational Downsizing: Or; is Your Name on Schindler's List?
Administration Society, May 1, 1997; 29(2): 222 - 247.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
J. P. Forrester and G. B. Adams
Budgetary Reform Through Organizational Learning: Toward an Organizational Theory of Budgeting
Administration Society, February 1, 1997; 28(4): 466 - 488.
[Abstract]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
K. H. Jacobson
Where there is Power, there is no Eros: A Jungian Interpretation of the Weberian Legacy
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 1995; 25(1): 21 - 42.
[Abstract]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
B. E. Ashforth and R. H. Humphrey
Emotion in the Workplace: A Reappraisal
Human Relations, February 1, 1995; 48(2): 97 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
A. N. Carr
The "Emotional Fallout" of the New Efficiency Movement in Public Administration in Australia: A Case Study
Administration Society, November 1, 1994; 26(3): 344 - 358.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
K. H. Jacobson
Organization and the Mother Archetype: A Jungian Analysis of Adult Development and Self-Identity within the Organization
Administration Society, May 1, 1993; 25(1): 60 - 84.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
M. A. Diamond
Hobbesian and Rousseauian Identities: The Psychodynamics of Organizational Leadership and Change
Administration Society, November 1, 1992; 24(3): 267 - 289.
[Abstract]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
B. E. Ashforth and R. T. Lee
Defensive Behavior in Organizations: A Preliminary Model
Human Relations, July 1, 1990; 43(7): 621 - 648.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
R. Kramer
In the Shadow of Death: Robert Denhardt's Theology of Organizational Life
Administration Society, November 1, 1989; 21(3): 357 - 379.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
M. A. Diamond
Organizational Identity: A Psychoanalytic Exploration of Organizational Meaning
Administration Society, August 1, 1988; 20(2): 166 - 190.
[Abstract]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
M. A. Diamond and S. Allcorn
Psychological Responses to Stress in Complex Organizations
Administration Society, August 1, 1985; 17(2): 217 - 239.
[Abstract]